openclaw-mission-control — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by abhi1693 · Codex Skill · ★ 4.1k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is openclaw-mission-control safe to install? View the security audit →

About openclaw-mission-control

OpenClaw Mission Control OpenClaw Mission Control is the centralized operations and governance platform for running OpenClaw across teams and organizations, with unified visibility, approval controls, and gateway-aware orchestration. It gives operators a single interface for work orchestration, agent and gateway management, approval-driven governance, and API-backed automation. Platform overview Mission Control is designed to be th

ai-agentsautomationopenclaworchestration

Quick Facts

Stars4,108
Forks818
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.1652778745866/100
Open Issues85
Last Updated2026-08-06
Created2026-02-01
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with openclaw-mission-control for enhanced workflows:

  • mission-control — semantic(0.80)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (70%)
  • mission-control — semantic(0.39)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • takt — semantic(0.38)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • trigger.dev — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • ClawX — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)

openclaw-mission-control alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a openclaw-mission-control alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-mission-control with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • trigger.dev by triggerdotdev · ⭐ 16.5k

    Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows

  • commands by wshobson · ⭐ 2.6k

    Archived. The original Claude Code slash commands, replaced by the plugin marketplace at wshobson/agents.

  • rowboat by rowboatlabs · ⭐ 18.0k

    AI coworker with memory and collaboration

  • superset by superset-sh · ⭐ 14.8k

    Superset is an agentic IDE to orchestrate 100+ coding agents in parallel. Run any agent with your own subscrip

  • bytebot by bytebot-ai · ⭐ 11.1k

    Bytebot is a self-hosted AI desktop agent that automates computer tasks through natural language commands, ope

  • lamda by firerpa · ⭐ 8.5k

    Android Full-Stack Device Control Platform: WebRTC/H.264 remote desktop, UI/OCR/image-matching automation, one

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is openclaw-mission-control?

openclaw-mission-control is AI Agent Orchestration Dashboard - Manage AI agents, assign tasks, and coordinate multi-agent collaboration via OpenClaw Gateway.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 4.1k GitHub stars.

What programming language is openclaw-mission-control written in?

openclaw-mission-control is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, automation, openclaw.

How do I install or use openclaw-mission-control?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openclaw-mission-control GitHub repository at github.com/abhi1693/openclaw-mission-control. The project has 4.1k stars and 818 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does openclaw-mission-control use?

openclaw-mission-control is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to openclaw-mission-control?

The top alternatives to openclaw-mission-control on Agent Skills Hub include trigger.dev, commands, rowboat. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools