by addyosmani · Agent Tool · ★ 60
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install -g adverse
npx adverse review ./srcTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 60 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-20 |
| Created | 2026-05-08 |
| Platforms | cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~8k |
adverse Multi-agent adversarial code review for any coding agent. Ships as both a standalone CLI and a Claude Code Skill — pick whichever fits your workflow, the underlying logic is the same Node.js code. Two ways to run it As a CLI Wraps any coding-agent CLI that reads stdin and writes stdout — Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini, Aider, Ollama.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: