by adham90 · Agent Tool · ★ 140
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 140 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | Ruby |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 77/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-09 |
| Created | 2025-11-25 |
| Platforms | ruby |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
RubyLLM::Agents Production-ready Rails engine for building, managing, and monitoring LLM-powered AI agents Build intelligent AI agents in Ruby with a clean DSL, automatic execution tracking, cost analytics, budget controls, and a beautiful real-time dashboard. Supports OpenAI GPT-4, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and more through RubyLLM.
These tools work well together with ruby_llm-agents for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ruby_llm-agents alternative? If you're comparing ruby_llm-agents with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Rails Engine with MCP compliant Spec.
Open-source AI copilot that lets you chat with your observability data and code 🧙♂️
🐘 Give AI assistants full PostgreSQL DBA superpowers — 30+ tools for performance analysis, bloat detection, l
10 Claude sessions running. What are they doing? Live dashboard — monitor, cost tracking, search, sub-agent vi
Production-ready multi-agent orchestration engine built on Google ADK. Database-driven agent config, 50+ LLM p
💎 Make your Rails app usable by AI agents
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: