by akovalion · Claude Skill · ★ 16
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-07-08 |
| Platforms | claude-code, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Claude Code skills that turn an AI agent into a meticulous QA engineer. Evidence or it didn't happen.
Looking for a paranoid-qa alternative? If you're comparing paranoid-qa with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
Open-source agent skills by Testany: engineering, prompts, content, testing, and SkillDock for visual Codex sk
Agent Skill providing expert Swift Testing guidance for AI coding tools: covering test doubles, fixtures, asyn
Universal, language-agnostic development standards for software projects. Includes coding standards, git workf
Advanced Claude Code CLI toolkit - agents, hooks, skills, MCP servers, phased development, site intelligence d
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: