by alphaonedev · MCP Server · ★ 54
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
cargo install --git https://github.com/alphaonedev/ai-memory-mcp.git
pip install ai-memory-mcpTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 54 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 1146 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-15 |
| Created | 2026-04-02 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~34k |
ai-memory™ universal AI memory [![v0.6.4
Looking for a ai-memory-mcp alternative? If you're comparing ai-memory-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Persistent long-term memory for Claude Code via MCP — captures coding decisions, bugfixes, and context across
Cross-agent memory for AI coding tools: one self-hostable knowledge graph shared by Claude Code, Codex, OpenCo
Agentic AI memory with Ebbinghaus forgetting curve decay. +16pp better recall than Mem0 on LoCoMo.
Open-source governed, local-first memory control plane for AI agents and teams. arXiv:2608.08253
Human-like memory for AI agents — semantic, episodic & procedural. Experience-driven procedures that learn fro
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: