by anshulyadav1976 · MCP Server · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-05 |
| Created | 2026-09-07 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Private local memory for any AI agent: Markdown database, SQLite search, MCP, zero runtime dependencies.
These tools work well together with synapse for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a synapse alternative? If you're comparing synapse with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The recorder for your AI conversations — local-first MCP memory that keeps byte-exact copies of your Claude Co
Local-first AI PKM for coding conversations: import Claude Code/Cursor/Codex, distill notes, semantic search,
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: