by anthropics · Claude Skill · ★ 1.0k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,010 |
| Forks | 201 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-23 |
| Created | 2026-06-16 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~4k |
launch-your-agent A Claude Code skill that helps a technical founder build whatever they want on Claude Managed Agents (CMA) — an internal worker, a piece of their product, a customer-facing agent. It interviews you about what you want to build, scopes a v0, launches it in your own account, grades it against your own definition of done, iterates, and (if it should run on a clock) puts it on a...
Looking for a launch-your-agent alternative? If you're comparing launch-your-agent with other claude skill tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM
An open-source AI based digital marketing operating system for strategy, SEO, AEO/GEO, paid media, content, CR
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: