dsh-antibrow — security grade SAFE, quality 58/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 58/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by antibrow · MCP Server · ★ 124

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is dsh-antibrow safe to install? View the security audit →

About dsh-antibrow

dsh-antibrow A DeepSeek Harness plugin that gives the agent a browser with an identity. The browser is AntiBrow: a Chromium fork with fingerprint configuration at engine level, driven through the standard Playwright API. SDK docs are at antibrow.com/docs, and the dated detection measurements - including the checks that fail - are at antibrow.com/reports. Why not a plain browser plugin Every other browser plugin hands the agent a fresh Chromium. That is fine for reading a public page and useless for anything behind a login: the session dies with the process, the fingerprint is a stock automation build, and the traffic leaves from your machine. last session restored, so the agent re

agent-toolsai-agentsandroid-emulationanti-detect-browserbrowser-automationbrowser-fingerprintingdeepseek-harnessdshdsh-pluginfingerprint-browser

Quick Facts

Stars124
Forks0
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score58.143126670577/100
Open Issues18
Last Updated2026-09-12
Created2026-08-17
Platformsbrowser, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~5k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with dsh-antibrow for enhanced workflows:

  • CloakBrowser — semantic(0.45)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)

dsh-antibrow alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a dsh-antibrow alternative? If you're comparing dsh-antibrow with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • memtrace-public by syncable-dev · ⭐ 486

    Structural memory for AI coding agents. Bi-temporal graph, MCP-native, zero LLM calls. Cursor · Claude Code ·

  • web-agent-protocol by OTA-Tech-AI · ⭐ 509

    🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support

  • safari-mcp by achiya-automation · ⭐ 210

    Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 98 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs s

  • jacobian by morluto · ⭐ 203

    Composable mathematics tools for agents

  • agent-skills by youdotcom-oss · ⭐ 82

    You.com skills and plugins for web search, content extraction, research, finance, and integration discovery, h

  • browser-mcp by Agent360dk · ⭐ 51

    The browser tool that can stop and ask you. A 2FA code, a CAPTCHA, a choice only you can make: it asks on your

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is dsh-antibrow?

dsh-antibrow is DeepSeek Harness plugin: give your agent a browser with a persistent identity - engine-level fingerprint spoofing, unlimited free local profiles, Android device emulation, passkeys that survive, and r. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 124 GitHub stars.

What programming language is dsh-antibrow written in?

dsh-antibrow is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as agent-tools, ai-agents, android-emulation.

How do I install or use dsh-antibrow?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the dsh-antibrow GitHub repository at github.com/antibrow/dsh-antibrow. The project has 124 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does dsh-antibrow use?

dsh-antibrow is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to dsh-antibrow?

The top alternatives to dsh-antibrow on Agent Skills Hub include memtrace-public, web-agent-protocol, safari-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools