by atharvamhaske · Agent Tool · ★ 13
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 13 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-21 |
| Created | 2026-09-18 |
| Platforms | go |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
unofficial go sdk for typesafe ai. not affiliated with or endorsed by typesafe ai. a side project built to fill the missing go sdk gap, for the community to use.
Looking for a typesafe-sdk-go alternative? If you're comparing typesafe-sdk-go with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w
✋ Interactive CLI tool for selecting and bundling code into a single, LLM-ready output file
Jev / TypeSafe System One 中文精选列表：官方资料、SDK、爆款应用、Agent 工具、开源复现与独立评测，附中文上手指南，每日自动收录 GitHub 热门项目。
Process manager for AI agents (and humans)
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
Go SDK for interacting with the MCP Toolbox for Databases.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: