awesome-jev-zh — security grade SAFE, quality 60/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 60/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by yzfly · Agent Tool · ★ 60

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is awesome-jev-zh safe to install? View the security audit →

About awesome-jev-zh

Awesome Jev ZH Jev 不生成文本。 第一次看到这句话时我以为是个缺陷,后来才发现这正是它的设计核心。 它的用法是:给它一段 state(一封邮件、一行日志、一个工单),再给它几个带类型的问题,它在 70–500ms 内一次性答完——从你给的选项里选一个、在你给的量表上打一个分、或者给出一个 0 到 1 的概率,每个答案都附带一个置信度。输入 $0.042 / MTok,输出不计费。 它的边界也很清楚:要写文案、要总结文章、要解释判断理由,LLM 仍然是更合适的工具。这一条后面还会出现好几次。 那它解决了什么?整理这份列表的过程中,我越来越确信一件事:我们今天写的很多 LLM 调用,本质上只是在做选择题。 拼 prompt、逐 token 生成、剥掉 markdown 代码块、、校验 schema、失败了再重试——绕这么大一圈,只为了拿回 这一个词。这段代码我自己写过不止一次。Jev 想省掉的就是这一圈。 另外有两个数字想先摆出来,免得看完才发现:「快 193 倍」来自 TypeSafe 自己的评测,官方也标注了那是收益上限;而独立评测里,在钓鱼邮件这个具体任务上,直接问它一句只有 62.6% 的准确率,两行正则规则能到 91.8%。完整数据在 冷静看待 一节。 这是 Jev 生态的中文精选列表,外加两份中文指南和一份 图解说明。 非官方整理,与 TypeSafe AI 无隶属关系 · Jev 于 2026-09-15 开放 early access · 所有厂商自评数据都标注了出处 目录 入门 — 官方资源 · Jev 是什么 · 上手 · 规格与定价 · 该用与不该用 · 中文指南 项目 — 热门自动榜 · SDK · 应用 · Demo · Agent 工具 · 复现与评测 资料 — Cookbook 与模式 · 文章 · 社区 · 冷静看待 📘 官方资源 官方文档写得相当清楚。真要弄懂这个模型

ai-agentawesomeawesome-listchinesejevllmstructured-outputsystem-onetypesafetypesafe-ai

Quick Facts

Stars60
Forks16
LanguageHTML
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseCC0-1.0
Quality Score60.3745562352313/100
Open Issues6
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-09-18
Est. Tokens~28k

awesome-jev-zh alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a awesome-jev-zh alternative? If you're comparing awesome-jev-zh with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-jev by kraayenjon · ⭐ 113

    A curated list of Jev use cases, projects, SDKs, and resources. Jev is TypeSafe AI's System One model for fast

  • awesome-jev by hellogumbo · ⭐ 149

    A community directory of projects built on Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One model.

  • awesome-jev by OmniJev · ⭐ 65

    🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.

  • awesome-jev-typesafe by valentynkit · ⭐ 130

    Typed decisions with TypeSafe's Jev, the first System One model

  • awesome-jev by AppitStudio · ⭐ 78

    Curated Jev resources and runnable examples for typed AI decisions.

  • open-alternative-jev by ikermoel · ⭐ 51

    Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular HTML Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is awesome-jev-zh?

awesome-jev-zh is Jev / TypeSafe System One 中文精选列表:官方资料、SDK、爆款应用、Agent 工具、开源复现与独立评测,附中文上手指南,每日自动收录 GitHub 热门项目。. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 60 GitHub stars.

What programming language is awesome-jev-zh written in?

awesome-jev-zh is primarily written in HTML. It covers topics such as ai-agent, awesome, awesome-list.

How do I install or use awesome-jev-zh?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the awesome-jev-zh GitHub repository at github.com/yzfly/awesome-jev-zh. The project has 60 stars and 16 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does awesome-jev-zh use?

awesome-jev-zh is released under the CC0-1.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to awesome-jev-zh?

The top alternatives to awesome-jev-zh on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-jev, awesome-jev, awesome-jev. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools