typesafe-computer-use — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by awlevin · Agent Tool · ★ 573

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is typesafe-computer-use safe to install? View the security audit →

Featured in: TypeSafe Jev

About typesafe-computer-use

typesafe-computer-use drives a Mac toward a goal you type in plain English, for about a fiftieth of a cent per step. It never sends a screenshot to a big model. Instead it reads the screen deterministically, asks a small classifier which action comes next, and only calls a writing model when a text field genuinely needs free text. Why Frontier-model computer use is capable and expensive: every step ships a s

ai-agentsautomationcomputer-usemacosocrtypesafe

Quick Facts

Stars573
Forks34
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score70.5060443364302/100
Open Issues8
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2026-09-16
Platformscli, python
Est. Tokens~17k

typesafe-computer-use alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a typesafe-computer-use alternative? If you're comparing typesafe-computer-use with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ghost-os by ghostwright · ⭐ 1.7k

    Full computer-use for AI agents. Self-learning workflows. Native macOS. No screenshots required.

  • open-computer-use by coasty-ai · ⭐ 763

    State of the Art 82% OSWorld Computer Using Agent, production-ready. Remote and Local! Setup using one API Key

  • daymon by daymonio · ⭐ 368

    Daymon puts your favorite AI to work 24/7. It schedules, remembers, and orchestrates your own virtual team. Fr

  • native-devtools-mcp by sh3ll3x3c · ⭐ 125

    MCP server for computer use & browser automation - screenshot, OCR, click, type, find_text, Chrome/Electron C

  • claude-code-plugins-plus-skills by jeremylongshore · ⭐ 2.7k

    471 plugins, 3,069 skills, 347 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the cc

  • OpenAdapt by OpenAdaptAI · ⭐ 1.7k

    Compile a demonstrated GUI workflow into a deterministic, locally executable program. Zero model calls on heal

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is typesafe-computer-use?

typesafe-computer-use is Computer use for about $0.0002 a step: OCR the screen, classify the next action with TypeSafe, click. macOS.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 573 GitHub stars.

What programming language is typesafe-computer-use written in?

typesafe-computer-use is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agents, automation, computer-use.

How do I install or use typesafe-computer-use?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the typesafe-computer-use GitHub repository at github.com/awlevin/typesafe-computer-use. The project has 573 stars and 34 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does typesafe-computer-use use?

typesafe-computer-use is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to typesafe-computer-use?

The top alternatives to typesafe-computer-use on Agent Skills Hub include ghost-os, open-computer-use, daymon. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools