by benchflow-ai · Agent Tool · ★ 1.0k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,025 |
| Forks | 147 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 53/100 |
| Open Issues | 81 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2026-06-24 |
| Est. Tokens | ~28k |
Awesome Agent Evals A curated, opinionated, non-BS library of the best resources for building and evaluating AI agents — papers, blog posts, talks, courses, tools, and benchmarks. Maintained by BenchFlow · "Environments are the new data." Most "awesome" lists are link dumps.
Looking for a awesome-evals alternative? If you're comparing awesome-evals with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A database of SDKs, frameworks, libraries, and tools for creating, monitoring, debugging and deploying autonom
A curated list of Generative AI tools, works, models, and references
A curated list of awesome platforms, tools, practices and resources that helps run LLMs locally
A curation of awesome tools, documents and projects about LLM Security.
A curated list of awesome resources, tools, and other shiny things for LLM prompt engineering.
🔥 A list of tools, frameworks, and resources for building AI web agents
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: