by biniamf · Agent Tool · ★ 204
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 204 |
| Forks | 31 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-31 |
| Created | 2025-10-04 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Rev·Deck — AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering with Ghidra Rev·Deck is a local, single-user static-analysis workstation. It pairs an evidence-first web UI with an LLM copilot over a binary analyzed by a headless Ghidra service: browse deterministic evidence (functions, strings, imports, cross-references, a bounded call graph) directly, or ask the assistant bounded questions whose factual claims must...
These tools work well together with ai-reverse-engineering for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ai-reverse-engineering alternative? If you're comparing ai-reverse-engineering with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Automate Ghidra reverse engineering from the command line — headless analysis, decompilation, and structured J
MCP server for reverse engineering tasks in Ghidra 👩💻
An native MCP server extension for Ghidra
An MCP extension for Ghidra
Index the world's undocumented APIs
A SKILL.md for ipsw
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: