bridgic-browser — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by bitsky-tech · Agent Tool · ★ 74

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is bridgic-browser safe to install? View the security audit →

About bridgic-browser

English | 中文 Bridgic Browser Bridgic Browser is a Python library for LLM-driven browser automation built on Playwright. It includes CLI tools, Python tools and skills for AI agents. Features Comprehensive CLI Tools - 67 tools organized into 15 categories; Designed to integrate with any AI agent Python-based Tools - Used for agent / workflow code generation; Easier integration with Bridgic Snapshot with Semantic Invariance - A representation of page snapshot based on accessibility tree and a specially designed ref-generation algorithm that ensures element refs remain unchanged across page reloads Skills - Used for guided exploration and code generation; Compatible with most of coding agents Stealth Mode (Enabled by Default) - Mode-aware anti-detection covering 24+ JS/CDP fingerprint vectors.

agent-toolsai-agentbrowser-automationclillmplaywrightpython

Quick Facts

Stars74
Forks6
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score67.2436191762858/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-05-19
Created2026-02-03
Platformsbrowser, cli, python
Est. Tokens~878k

bridgic-browser alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a bridgic-browser alternative? If you're comparing bridgic-browser with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator by Coff0xc · ⭐ 263

    MCP-native security automation workbench (SDK + CLI + MCP) — authorized testing + static AI/MCP attack-surface

  • utcp-mcp by universal-tool-calling-protocol · ⭐ 202

    All-in-one MCP server that can connect your AI agents to any native endpoint, powered by UTCP

  • open-extract by velocitybolt · ⭐ 189

    Structured Data Extractor for AI Agents. Search your documents or the web for specific data and get it back in

  • ai-agent-tools-catalog by GetStream · ⭐ 164

    Explore the must-have external ready-made toolkits to integrate with your AI agents built with Python and Type

  • eval-view by hidai25 · ⭐ 133

    Regression testing for AI agents. Snapshot behavior,diff tool calls,catch regressions in CI. Works with LangGr

  • apitap by n1byn1kt · ⭐ 124

    CLI, MCP server, and npm library that turns any website into an API — no docs, no SDK, no browser.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is bridgic-browser?

bridgic-browser is LLM-driven browser automation library built on Playwright with 67 CLI/SDK tools, stable snapshot refs, and stealth mode.基于 Playwright 的 LLM 驱动浏览器自动化库,提供 67 个 CLI/SDK 工具、稳定快照引用(ref)与默认隐身模式,适用于 AI Agent. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 74 GitHub stars.

What programming language is bridgic-browser written in?

bridgic-browser is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-tools, ai-agent, browser-automation.

How do I install or use bridgic-browser?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the bridgic-browser GitHub repository at github.com/bitsky-tech/bridgic-browser. The project has 74 stars and 6 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does bridgic-browser use?

bridgic-browser is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to bridgic-browser?

The top alternatives to bridgic-browser on Agent Skills Hub include AutoRedTeam-Orchestrator, utcp-mcp, open-extract. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools