by bybren-llc · Agent Tool · ★ 425
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 425 |
| Forks | 92 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 8 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-20 |
| Created | 2025-10-05 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
SAW — SAFe Agentic Workflow AI Agent Harness for Multi-Agent Team Workflows A Production-Tested Three-Layer Architecture for Coordinated AI Teams
These tools work well together with safe-agentic-workflow for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a safe-agentic-workflow alternative? If you're comparing safe-agentic-workflow with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Autonomous software engineering fleet of AI agents for production-grade PRs on AgentField: plan, code, test, a
Cross-runtime skills for Claude Code, Codex, and multi-agent workflows.
An engineering team in a box for Claude Code — 12 specialized agents, 15 automation hooks, and the P7/P9/P10 m
The control plane for AI coding agents.
Open-source local workbench for multi-agent software development.
The Agent Harness for AI-Human Collaboration, inspired by the AI-DLC (AI-Driven Development Lifecycle)
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: