handoff — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by dazuiba · Claude Skill · ★ 83

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is handoff safe to install? View the security audit →

About handoff

With Handoff, your coding agents can finally work together. No tool-switching, no lost context. English · 简体中文 Why handoff If you use more than one coding agent, these will sound familiar: 💸 "Claude / Codex: the $20 plan never lasts. The $100 plan costs too much." — Just say: "Give this task to ." DeepSeek does the work fast and cheap. Save your expensive quota for decisions. 🤔 "DeepSeek is stuck. I want a second opinion from Codex." — Just say: "Ask what it thinks." No new terminal. No re-explaining. The answer comes back to your current session. 🔁 " finished that task. Now I have a follow-up task for it." — Just say: "Resume the last session, then do X." It just sends one more message in the old conversation — all the old context is still there. The math is simple: DeepSeek V4 is as capable as Sonnet, and on OpenCode Go the same money buys 18× the work: | Option

agent-handoffsagent-orchestrationclaude-cliclaude-codeclaude-skillscodexcodex-skillcoding-agentdeepseekorchestrators

Quick Facts

Stars83
Forks10
LanguagePython
CategoryClaude Skill
Quality Score64.847802978371/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-08-02
Created2026-06-05
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with handoff for enhanced workflows:

  • sub-agents-skills — semantic(0.25)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • tensorlake-skills — semantic(0.23)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • skills — semantic(0.36)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)

handoff alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a handoff alternative? If you're comparing handoff with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • skills by fabricioctelles · ⭐ 98

    A collection of skills for AI agents (Kiro, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, and others). Each skill is a reusab

  • speq-skill by marconae · ⭐ 54

    A light-weight and straightforward system for spec-driven development with Claude Code or OpenAI Codex. Writte

  • golembot by 0xranx · ⭐ 322

    Any Agent × Any Provider × Anywhere. Connect Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode, or Codex to Slack, Telegram, Disco

  • jat by joewinke · ⭐ 251

    The World's First Agentic IDE. Visual dashboard: live sessions, task management, code editor, terminal. Epic S

  • aivo by yuanchuan · ⭐ 194

    Use your favorite coding agent with any model.

  • palot by ItsWendell · ⭐ 190

    Just another desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is handoff?

handoff is Delegate tasks to DeepSeek right inside your Claude Code / Codex sessions.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 83 GitHub stars.

What programming language is handoff written in?

handoff is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-handoffs, agent-orchestration, claude-cli.

How do I install or use handoff?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the handoff GitHub repository at github.com/dazuiba/handoff. The project has 83 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to handoff?

The top alternatives to handoff on Agent Skills Hub include skills, speq-skill, golembot. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools