by distil-labs · AI Tool · ★ 95
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 95 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-07 |
| Created | 2026-01-25 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
AI Slop Detector 🔍: Catch AI-generated text with a 270M model that runs in your browser Slop happens. Now you can spot it - without sending your text anywhere. We fine-tuned a tiny language model to detect AI-generated text. Because it's small (270M parameters, quantized to 242 MB), you can run it entirely in your browser - no API keys, no cloud dependencies, no data leakage.
Looking for a distil-ai-slop-detector alternative? If you're comparing distil-ai-slop-detector with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: