by dotoricode · Claude Skill · ★ 15
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 15 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-13 |
| Created | 2026-04-28 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Korean humanizer prompt and skill for removing the usual AI smell from generated writing.
Looking for a korean-humanizer alternative? If you're comparing korean-humanizer with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Best Practices for Claude Code Configuration
From one sentence to a publishable book. 21 AI skills for Claude Code that automate the entire book writing pi
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
🇰🇷 400+ Korean AI Coding Agent Skills — Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex, Cursor 스킬을 기능별로 모은 큐레이션
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Show it a video you love. Get a new video in the same style. An AI crew (Claude Code or Codex) plans, builds a
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: