by expectedparrot · Agent Tool · ★ 515
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 515 |
| Forks | 89 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 62 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2024-01-02 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Expected Parrot Domain-Specific Language (EDSL) EDSL makes it easy to conduct computational social science and market research with AI. Use it to design and run surveys and experiments with many AI agents and large language models at once, or to perform complex data labeling and other research tasks.
Looking for a edsl alternative? If you're comparing edsl with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Python library for building with LLMs. One interface across 11 providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek,
Ship RAG based LLM web apps in seconds.
Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework
AI-powered synthetic data generation — structured tables, unstructured documents, multi-provider LLM support,
A handy lib for smooth interaction with large language models (LLMs) and crafting AI apps.
[ICML 2024] LLMCompiler: An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: