edsl — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by expectedparrot · Agent Tool · ★ 497

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is edsl safe to install? View the security audit →

About edsl

Expected Parrot Domain-Specific Language (EDSL) EDSL makes it easy to conduct computational social science and market research with AI. Use it to design and run surveys and experiments with many AI agents and large language models at once, or to perform complex data labeling and other research tasks. Results are formatted as specified datasets that can be replicated at no cost, and come with built-in methods for analysis, visualization and collaboration. Getting started Run to install the package. See instructions. Create an account to run surveys at the Expected Parrot server and access a universal remote cache of stored responses for reproducing results. Choose whether to use your own keys for language models or get an Expected Parrot key to access all available models at once. Securely manage keys, expenses and usage for your team from your account. Run the <a href="htt

anthropicdata-labelingdeepinfradomain-specific-languageexperimentsllama2llmllm-agentllm-frameworkllm-inference

Quick Facts

Stars497
Forks85
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.9987228427722/100
Open Issues49
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2024-01-02
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

edsl alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a edsl alternative? If you're comparing edsl with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • SimplerLLM by hassancs91 · ⭐ 219

    Python library for building with LLMs. One interface across 11 providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek,

  • autollm by viddexa · ⭐ 1.0k

    Ship RAG based LLM web apps in seconds.

  • palico-ai by palico-ai · ⭐ 343

    Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework

  • captain-claw by kstevica · ⭐ 165

    Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic

  • ai-microcore by Nayjest · ⭐ 108

    A handy lib for smooth interaction with large language models (LLMs) and crafting AI apps.

  • LLMCompiler by SqueezeAILab · ⭐ 1.9k

    [ICML 2024] LLMCompiler: An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is edsl?

edsl is Design, conduct and analyze results of AI-powered surveys and experiments. Simulate social science and market research with large numbers of AI agents and LLMs.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 497 GitHub stars.

What programming language is edsl written in?

edsl is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as anthropic, data-labeling, deepinfra.

How do I install or use edsl?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the edsl GitHub repository at github.com/expectedparrot/edsl. The project has 497 stars and 85 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does edsl use?

edsl is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to edsl?

The top alternatives to edsl on Agent Skills Hub include SimplerLLM, autollm, palico-ai. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools