by fronalabs · Agent Tool · ★ 202
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 202 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-02 |
| Created | 2026-02-28 |
| Platforms | browser, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Frona is a personal AI assistant. You create autonomous agents that browse the web, run code, build applications, make phone calls, connect to messaging channels, delegate work to each other, and remember context across conversations, all within sandboxed environments with controlled access to your files,
Looking for a frona alternative? If you're comparing frona with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Ultra-Lightweight, Pure Python Multimodal Agent.
Open-source implementation of the AEON Protocol for advanced AI cognitive observability, featuring real-time d
Ultra-lightweight and efficient personal AI assistant
Open-source AI agent runtime built in Rust. Define once, deploy isolated instances per tenant with built-in me
Your Very Own Agent: The Ultimate, Complete Edition
ARGO is an open-source AI Agent platform that brings Local Manus to your desktop. With one-click model downloa
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: