by fuxiAIlab · Agent Tool · ★ 166
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 166 |
| Forks | 16 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MPL-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2025-03-17 |
| Created | 2024-06-05 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~3619k |
CivAgent: Large Language Models based Human-like Agent English Moved the project repository to a new location: https://github.com/asdqsczser/CivAgent. CivAgent is an LLM-based Human-like Agent acting as a Digital Player within the strategy game Unciv.
Looking for a CivAgent alternative? If you're comparing CivAgent with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Awesome papers involving LLMs in Social Science.
Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework
All-in-one Web Agent framework for post-training. Start building with a few clicks!
[NeurIPS 2024 D&B] GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agents & [arXiv 2026] GTA-2
A declarative way to control LLMs.
It is a comprehensive resource hub compiling all LLM papers accepted at the International Conference on Learni
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: