by iMeanAI · Agent Tool · ★ 281
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 281 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2025-07-07 |
| Created | 2024-06-06 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~4145k |
WebCanvas: All-in-one Open-Source Framework for Building, Training, and Evaluating Web Agents Platform • Paper • <img src="https:
These tools work well together with WebCanvas for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a WebCanvas alternative? If you're comparing WebCanvas with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Awesome papers involving LLMs in Social Science.
Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework
[EMNLP 2026] AgentCompass is an extensible open-source evaluation infrastructure for systematically assessing
CivAgent is an LLM-based Human-like Agent acting as a Digital Player within the Strategy Game Unciv.
[NeurIPS 2024 D&B] GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agents & [arXiv 2026] GTA-2
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: