by fzn0x · Agent Tool · ★ 215
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/fzn0x/watchtower.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 215 |
| Forks | 33 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-14 |
| Created | 2026-02-27 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
🏰 Watchtower (AI-Powered Penetration Testing Framework) []() Watchtower is a simple AI-powered penetration testing automation CLI tool that leverages LLMs and LangGraph to orchestrate agentic workflows that you can use to test your websites locally. Generate useful pentest reports for your websites. Penetration testing is red team activity and should be done with permission.
Looking for a watchtower alternative? If you're comparing watchtower with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI Powered penetration testing Platform for offensive security research
AI-powered penetration testing MCP server
A growing collection of MCP servers bringing offensive security tools to AI assistants. Nmap, Ghidra, Nuclei,
MCP server that connects AI assistants to HackerOne for bug bounty hunting
Offensive security toolkit for Claude Code
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: