humanize — security grade SAFE, quality 72/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 72/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by harshaneel · Claude Skill · ★ 347

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is humanize safe to install? View the security audit →

About humanize

humanize LLM-agnostic skills for static AI text humanization and detection. Grounded in 50+ peer-reviewed sources through April 2026. Works in any LLM agent: Claude Code, Codex CLI, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Aider, OpenCode, Continue, Copilot. The install paths differ; the skill content is identical. Contents Get started What's inside — the two skills, at a glance Installation — one command for Claude Code, Codex CLI, ChatGPT desktop, or any agent Usage — how to invoke each skill Benchmark — 25 inputs, two independent scorers Why the skills work Background — the gap between AI and human writing [The detection literature](#the-detection-literature-what-resear

ai-content-detectionai-detectionai-humanizerai-writing-detectionclaude-codeclaude-skillscodexcodex-clicodex-skillgpt-detection

Quick Facts

Stars347
Forks39
LanguageHTML
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score71.7103440788088/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-07-10
Created2026-05-26
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex
Est. Tokens~24k

humanize alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a humanize alternative? If you're comparing humanize with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • humanizer-cli by 0xwilliamortiz · ⭐ 569

    33 ways to spot AI-written text, right in your terminal. Before/after examples, draft checker, zero dependenci

  • patina by devswha · ⭐ 355

    AI-writing humanizer for KO/EN/ZH/JA

  • humanizer-ru by ilyautov · ⭐ 327

    humanizer-ru: очеловечить русский AI-текст для Claude Code, Cursor, Codex и других AI-агентов. 64 признака ней

  • humanizer-de by marmbiz · ⭐ 150

    German AI Text Humanizer for Claude Code & Codex. Audits 72 German AI-writing patterns using deterministic lin

  • awesome-llm-skills by Prat011 · ⭐ 1.4k

    A curated list of awesome LLM and AI Agent Skills, resources and tools for customising AI Agent workflows - th

  • claude-codex-settings by fcakyon · ⭐ 1.1k

    Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular HTML Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is humanize?

humanize is Best static AI text humanizer. Two research-grounded LLM-agnostic skills that make AI writing sound human and relatable. Nine levers, 50+ peer-reviewed sources, 2024-2026 detection literature.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 347 GitHub stars.

What programming language is humanize written in?

humanize is primarily written in HTML. It covers topics such as ai-content-detection, ai-detection, ai-humanizer.

How do I install or use humanize?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the humanize GitHub repository at github.com/harshaneel/humanize. The project has 347 stars and 39 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does humanize use?

humanize is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to humanize?

The top alternatives to humanize on Agent Skills Hub include humanizer-cli, patina, humanizer-ru. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools