by hubhubgogo · Agent Tool · ★ 119
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 119 |
| Forks | 18 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2025-09-22 |
| Created | 2025-09-22 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~1k |
AI Model Comparison Tool | AI模型对比工具 English | 中文 A beautiful and intuitive web application for comparing AI model responses side-by-side. 一个美观直观的网页应用，用于并排对比不同AI模型的响应效果。 English 🚀 Features 🔄 Side-by-Side Comparison: Compare responses from two different AI models simultaneously 💬 Multi-turn Conversations: Support for follow-up questions with conversation history 🎨 Beautiful Interface: Modern,...
These tools work well together with AI-model-comparison for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a AI-model-comparison alternative? If you're comparing AI-model-comparison with other agent tool tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Lightweight registry to discover, install, and manage all public Claude plugins and agent skills for your favo
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: