by jatechan · Agent Tool · ★ 526
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 526 |
| Forks | 96 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-20 |
| Created | 2026-10-11 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
AI Coding Assistant Data Extraction Extract your own local chat history from AI coding assistants into a single, normalized JSONL format - for fine-tuning, personal analytics, or just backing up years of conversations before an app's local database gets cleared.
These tools work well together with ai-data-extractor for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ai-data-extractor alternative? If you're comparing ai-data-extractor with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Free open-source extractor for AI coding assistant chat histories. Supports Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Aid
Engineering decisions engine that know when they're stale. Frame, compare, decide — with evidence decay and p
Become 10x Vibe Coder. Awesome Vibe Coding guide, best practices, and tips for efficient and controlled AI ass
An MCP Server for Ollama
An official Qdrant Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation
Hand-crafted Claude Code Skills focused on improving agent results quality. Compatible with OpenCode, Cursor,
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: