by jexp · Agent Tool · ★ 180
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 180 |
| Forks | 27 |
| Language | Jupyter Notebook |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-18 |
| Created | 2026-09-16 |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
neo4jev — Graph Navigation Demo (TypeSafe Jev + Neo4j) A demo application that navigates a Neo4j graph one hop at a time using TypeSafe's () structured-decision API instead of free-text LLM generation. At each visited node, the outgoing relationships are presented as options (relationship type, relationship properties, target node label/properties), and the API returns a full probability...
These tools work well together with neo4jev for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a neo4jev alternative? If you're comparing neo4jev with other agent tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A collection of Agent skills and Claude Code plugins for HashiCorp products.
Claude Code Skill Factory — A powerful open-source toolkit for building and deploying production-ready Claude
Lightweight registry to discover, install, and manage all public Claude plugins and agent skills for your favo
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: