by jiutianxvanyin · Claude Skill · ★ 11
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 59/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-15 |
| Created | 2026-09-03 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~9k |
Reduce the "AI-generated" feel in business and academic texts; applicable to both Chinese and English. 降低商务与学术文本的 AI 生成感，中英文均适用。
Looking for a humanizer-formal alternative? If you're comparing humanizer-formal with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Turn findings into publishable writing in your own voice, with an AI-pattern review gate and a learning loop.
A knowledge-graph AI writing assistant - tracks characters, threads, and world-building across your full manus
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
AI Tools - AutoHotkey - Enable global hotkeys to run custom OpenAI and Gemini prompts on text in any window.
Umbrella package for SciTeX — reproducible science from raw data to manuscript
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: