Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/joeseesun/suno-api-private.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 69 |
| Forks | 14 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | LGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 57/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-01-24 |
| Created | 2026-01-24 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Suno API - JWT Token Support 基于 gcui-art/suno-api 的改进版本 主要改进：支持直接使用 JWT Token 进行认证，解决 Clerk session 失效问题 🎯 为什么需要这个版本？ 问题：原版 suno-api 依赖 Clerk session 进行认证，但 Clerk API 经常返回空 session（），导致 401 Unauthorized 错误。 解决方案：本版本支持直接从浏览器提取 JWT Token，跳过 Clerk 认证流程，稳定可靠。 ✨ 主要改进 ✅ 支持直接使用 JWT Token：从浏览器 Network 请求中提取 token，不再依赖 Clerk session ✅ 自动检测认证方式：如果 cookie 中有 token，自动使用；否则回退到 Clerk 认证 ✅ 更好的隐私保护：增强...
Looking for a suno-api-private alternative? If you're comparing suno-api-private with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: