awesome-llm-agent-papers — security grade SAFE, quality 57/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 57/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by js-lee-AI · Agent Tool · ★ 87

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is awesome-llm-agent-papers safe to install? View the security audit →

About awesome-llm-agent-papers

🤖 Awesome LLM Agent Papers 200+ must-read papers, continuously growing: the annotated reading list for building LLM agents that plan, remember, use tools, and cooperate. Companion to the survey “LLM Agents: A Survey.” -- <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/js-lee-AI/awesome-llm-agent-papers?style=flat-square&labelColor=2b2b2b&color=8B2635" alt="GitHub

agent-benchmarkagent-surveyagentsai-agentsai-safetyautonomous-agentsawesomeawesome-listlarge-language-modelsllm

Quick Facts

Stars87
Forks27
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score57.1198901604346/100
Last Updated2026-10-03
Created2026-07-08
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~25k

awesome-llm-agent-papers alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a awesome-llm-agent-papers alternative? If you're comparing awesome-llm-agent-papers with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-ai-agents by aloth · ⭐ 60

    A curated list of AI agent frameworks, tools, platforms, research papers, and resources

  • agentic-ai by mahmoudrabie · ⭐ 159

    Agentic AI research papers, benchmarks, frameworks, and tools curated across 24 domains.

  • Awesome-AI-For-Security by AmanPriyanshu · ⭐ 145

    A curated list of tools, papers, and datasets for applying AI to cybersecurity tasks. This list primarily focu

  • LiteMultiAgent by PathOnAIOrg · ⭐ 103

    The Library for LLM-based multi-agent applications

  • agent-builder by strands-agents · ⭐ 428

    An example agent demonstrating streaming, tool use, and interactivity from your terminal. This agent builder c

  • mcp-server by strands-agents · ⭐ 293

    This MCP server provides documentation about Strands Agents to your GenAI tools, so you can use your favorite

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is awesome-llm-agent-papers?

awesome-llm-agent-papers is A curated, continuously updated reading list of 500+ papers on LLM agents: planning, memory, tool use, multi-agent, evaluation & safety. Companion to the survey 'LLM Agents: A Survey'.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 87 GitHub stars.

What programming language is awesome-llm-agent-papers written in?

awesome-llm-agent-papers is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-benchmark, agent-survey, agents.

How do I install or use awesome-llm-agent-papers?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the awesome-llm-agent-papers GitHub repository at github.com/js-lee-AI/awesome-llm-agent-papers. The project has 87 stars and 27 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does awesome-llm-agent-papers use?

awesome-llm-agent-papers is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to awesome-llm-agent-papers?

The top alternatives to awesome-llm-agent-papers on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-ai-agents, agentic-ai, Awesome-AI-For-Security. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools