No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by jtrackingai · Claude Skill · ★ 140
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is analytics-tracking-automation safe to install? View the security audit →
GA4 + GTM, done by AI. From site analysis to go live. Works with Cursor · Codex · Any AI Agent What You Get · Installation · Quick Start · Website Analytics Tracking Automation is a local-first AI skill for planning, reviewing, and delivering GA4 + GTM tracking. Use it when you want an agent to help with: analyzing a site before tracking work starts grouping pages by business purpose designing or reviewing a GA4 event plan comparing a proposed plan with an existing live GTM setup preparing GTM-ready outputs and verification guidance handling both generic websites and Shopify storefronts This README is intentionally user-facing and conversation-first. If you need the CLI surface or maintainer workflow, use DEVELOPING.md. What You Get For a given website, this skill can help produce: a reviewable site analysis business-friendly page groups a compact, decision-ready tracking plan GTM-ready tracking outputs verification and health summaries before go-live artifact-backed progress that can be resumed later Installation Most users only need the umbrella skill. Recommended Clone the repository loca
| Stars | 140 |
| Forks | 39 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 72.4484420627363/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-29 |
| Created | 2026-04-02 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~140k |
These tools work well together with analytics-tracking-automation for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a analytics-tracking-automation alternative? If you're comparing analytics-tracking-automation with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Google Analytics 4 data to AI agents, agentic workflows, and MCP clients. Give agents analysis-ready access to
A full marketing department for Claude Code. Skill packs for Klaviyo, Shopify, GA4, Looker Studio, paid media,
10 AI agent skills for Claude Code — waterfall email enrichment, TAM building, signal discovery, job change de
The best way to build a personality for your agent. Let Claude Code / OpenClaw ingest your data & build your A
Jetpack Compose Agent Skill — AI-powered coding guidance with actual androidx/androidx source code receipts. W
Business operating system for Claude Code — 57 skills, 21 agents, smart daemon. Unified inbox (WhatsApp/Email/
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
analytics-tracking-automation is AI-powered GA4 + GTM event tracking — automates site analysis, event schema, GTM sync, preview verification, and publishing. Works with Cursor, Codex, and any AI agent.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 140 GitHub stars.
analytics-tracking-automation is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as agent-skill, ai-agent, ai-skill.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the analytics-tracking-automation GitHub repository at github.com/jtrackingai/analytics-tracking-automation. The project has 140 stars and 39 forks, indicating an active community.
analytics-tracking-automation is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to analytics-tracking-automation on Agent Skills Hub include google-analytics-mcp, claude-marketing, gtm-eng-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: