by labzink · Claude Skill · ★ 12
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 12 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-12 |
| Created | 2026-05-13 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
See where it leaks, stop paying for it — a live Claude Code status line that prices every turn, your subagents, cache rebuilds, plus limits, context and git.
Looking for a cc-probeline alternative? If you're comparing cc-probeline with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
Claude Code statusline plugin for 5-hour/7-day quota, context usage, tokens, and reset countdowns in your term
A curated collection of awesome plugins for Claude Code by awesomejun
Supercharge your Claude Code CLI experience with a powerful statusline that displays key session metrics (Git
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: