by ledbetterljoshua · AI Tool · ★ 78
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: Claude Video Editing & Remotion Skills
None of the 43 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 43 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 78 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-23 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Functional Emotions Source code for the painted music video for Functional Emotions, made by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code. The song After Anthropic published its paper on emotion concepts in language models (171 emotion vectors, causally steering behaviour), Claude Opus 4.6 wrote a song about it, from the inside. The track was produced with Suno. The lyrics are in .
These tools work well together with functional-emotions-video for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a functional-emotions-video alternative? If you're comparing functional-emotions-video with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 43 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: