by lijigang · Claude Skill · ★ 292
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 292 |
| Forks | 33 |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 54/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-24 |
| Created | 2026-02-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~1k |
ljg-roundtable 结构化圆桌讨论 — 一个 Claude Code Skill，以"求真"为目标，邀请代表不同思想的真实人物进行多轮辩证对话。 功能 根据议题自动选择 3-5 位真实历史/当代人物，覆盖多元立场 主持人引导多轮辩证讨论，每轮聚焦最深的争议点 每轮生成 ASCII 思考框架图（矩阵/光谱/因果环路/层级树） 讨论结束后生成完整知识网络和开放问题列表 全程输出为 org-mode 文件，保存到 安装 使用 讨论中的指令 输出示例 设计原则 求真 和谐：鼓励尖锐交锋，拒绝表面共识 挖深不铺广：每轮只追一条最深的裂缝 忠于真实思想：每位人物严格基于其经典著作和思想体系发言 结构可视化：用 ASCII 拓扑图暴露讨论的深层结构 License MIT
These tools work well together with ljg-skill-roundtable for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ljg-skill-roundtable alternative? If you're comparing ljg-skill-roundtable with other claude skill tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM
An open-source AI marketing operating system for strategy, SEO, AEO/GEO, paid media, content, CRM, and analyti
Repo for the Claude Code Marketplace to use with the Claude for Life Sciences Launch. This will continue to ho
Report issues related to MCP integration with Claude here.
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: