by lludlow · Agent Tool · ★ 83
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 83 |
| Forks | 26 |
| Language | Dockerfile |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 52/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2025-01-09 |
| Created | 2024-04-14 |
| Platforms | docker |
| Est. Tokens | ~8k |
Docker container for Autogen Studio \ Running the docker container mount the location for database.sql and files Docker Compose
These tools work well together with autogen-studio for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a autogen-studio alternative? If you're comparing autogen-studio with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Roy: A lightweight, model-agnostic framework for crafting advanced multi-agent systems using large language mo
Local-first multi-AI group chat desktop app — pull gpt, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek into one conversation. Tauri
Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework
Multi-Agent Conversation Framework in TypeScript
Browser based Interface for Generative AI. Chat/Agent/Taskmanager Hybrid.
The Open Assistant API is a ready-to-use, open-source, self-hosted agent/gpts orchestration creation framework
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: