aibitat — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by wladpaiva · Agent Tool · ★ 150

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is aibitat safe to install? View the security audit →

About aibitat

This project is a fork from the original autogen but done in TypeScript. AIbitat - Multi-Agent Conversation Framework AIbitat is a stateless & extensible framework designed to enable interaction between multiple agents while allowing human participation. Think of it as Slack but for AI agents. Create agents, add them to channels and let them chat with each other. You can also add intractable agents to channels and let them participate in the conversation. Usage For a more complete example, check out the examples folder. You can install the package: Create an file and add your : Then create a file called and add the following: ts import {AIbitat} from 'aibitat' import {cli} from 'aibitat/plugins' const aibitat = new AIbitat() .use(cli()) .agent('client', { interrupt: 'ALWAYS', role: 'You are a human assistant. Reply "TERMINATE" when there is a correct answer or theres no answer to the question.', }) .agent('mathematician', { role: , }) .agent('reviewer', { role: You are a Peer-Reviewer and you do not solve math problems. Check the result from @m

agent-based-frameworkagentschatchat-applicationchatbotgptgpt-35-turbogpt-4llm-agentllm-framework

Quick Facts

Stars150
Forks20
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score63.9862307897416/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2026-04-20
Created2023-10-11
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~106k

aibitat alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a aibitat alternative? If you're comparing aibitat with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • craftgen by craftgen · ⭐ 316

    Integrating AI into every workflow with our open-source, no-code platform, powered by the actor model for dyna

  • BRAD by Jpickard1 · ⭐ 63

    A LLM powered agent for bioinformatics 🤖

  • taskyon by Xyntopia · ⭐ 54

    Browser based Interface for Generative AI. Chat/Agent/Taskmanager Hybrid.

  • LiteWebAgent by PathOnAIOrg · ⭐ 153

    [NAACL2025] LiteWebAgent: The Open-Source Suite for VLM-Based Web-Agent Applications

  • LiteMultiAgent by PathOnAIOrg · ⭐ 103

    The Library for LLM-based multi-agent applications

  • rojak by StreetLamb · ⭐ 83

    Python library for building durable and scalable multi-agent orchestrations.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is aibitat?

aibitat is Multi-Agent Conversation Framework in TypeScript. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 150 GitHub stars.

What programming language is aibitat written in?

aibitat is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as agent-based-framework, agents, chat.

How do I install or use aibitat?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the aibitat GitHub repository at github.com/wladpaiva/aibitat. The project has 150 stars and 20 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does aibitat use?

aibitat is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to aibitat?

The top alternatives to aibitat on Agent Skills Hub include craftgen, BRAD, taskyon. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools