by wladpaiva · Agent Tool · ★ 151
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
bun install aibitatTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 151 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-14 |
| Created | 2023-10-11 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~106k |
This project is a fork from the original autogen but done in TypeScript. AIbitat - Multi-Agent Conversation Framework AIbitat is a stateless & extensible framework designed to enable interaction between multiple agents while allowing human participation. Think of it as Slack but for AI agents. Create agents, add them to channels and let them chat with each other.
Looking for a aibitat alternative? If you're comparing aibitat with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Integrating AI into every workflow with our open-source, no-code platform, powered by the actor model for dyna
A LLM powered agent for bioinformatics 🤖
Browser based Interface for Generative AI. Chat/Agent/Taskmanager Hybrid.
[NAACL2025] LiteWebAgent: The Open-Source Suite for VLM-Based Web-Agent Applications
The Library for LLM-based multi-agent applications
Python library for building durable and scalable multi-agent orchestrations.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: