rojak — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by StreetLamb · Agent Tool · ★ 83

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is rojak safe to install? View the security audit →

About rojak

Rojak - A library for building highly durable and scalable multi-agent orchestrations. See it in action: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d61b8893-3c33-4002-bca9-740f403f51f1 Features 🛡️ Durable and Fault-Tolerant - Agents always completes, even when the server crashes or managing long-running tasks that span weeks, months, or even years. 🗂️ State Management - Messages, contexts and other states are automatically managed and preserved, even during failures. No complex database transactions required. 🤝 MCP Support - Supports calling tools via Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. 🧑‍💻 Human-In-The-Loop - Integrates human intervention for approving, rejecting, or modifying tool invocations and decisions, ensuring control over critical workflows. 📈 Scalable - Manage unlimited agents, and handle multiple chat sessions in parallel. ⏰ Scheduling - Schedule to run your agents

agent-based-frameworkagenticai-toolschatbotgptllm-frameworkllmsopen-sourcepythontemporal

Quick Facts

Stars83
Forks9
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score67.2951191568547/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2025-04-26
Created2024-12-26
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~65k

rojak alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a rojak alternative? If you're comparing rojak with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • aibitat by wladpaiva · ⭐ 150

    Multi-Agent Conversation Framework in TypeScript

  • craftgen by craftgen · ⭐ 316

    Integrating AI into every workflow with our open-source, no-code platform, powered by the actor model for dyna

  • LiteWebAgent by PathOnAIOrg · ⭐ 153

    [NAACL2025] LiteWebAgent: The Open-Source Suite for VLM-Based Web-Agent Applications

  • repopack-py by abinthomasonline · ⭐ 121

    Python version of 📦 repopack (https://github.com/yamadashy/repopack) by yamadashy (https://github.com/yamadas

  • ai-microcore by Nayjest · ⭐ 108

    A handy lib for smooth interaction with large language models (LLMs) and crafting AI apps.

  • LiteMultiAgent by PathOnAIOrg · ⭐ 103

    The Library for LLM-based multi-agent applications

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is rojak?

rojak is Python library for building durable and scalable multi-agent orchestrations.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 83 GitHub stars.

What programming language is rojak written in?

rojak is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-based-framework, agentic, ai-tools.

How do I install or use rojak?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the rojak GitHub repository at github.com/StreetLamb/rojak. The project has 83 stars and 9 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does rojak use?

rojak is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to rojak?

The top alternatives to rojak on Agent Skills Hub include aibitat, craftgen, LiteWebAgent. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools