Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/lykycy123/RoboJEV.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 61 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-27 |
| Created | 2026-09-20 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Two-stage JEV control of a Franka Panda in MuJoCo.Measured simulator state → task intent → Cartesian motion and gripper commands. Interactive showcase · Todo list · Demo presentation · Quick start · Evaluation · 中文 RoboJEV is a small, inspectable robotics laboratory.
These tools work well together with RoboJEV for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a RoboJEV alternative? If you're comparing RoboJEV with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: