humanizer_academic — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by matsuikentaro1 · Claude Skill · ★ 181

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is humanizer_academic safe to install? View the security audit →

Featured in: Anti-Slop

About humanizer_academic

Humanizer Academic A Claude Code skill that removes signs of AI-generated writing from academic medical papers, making them sound more natural and professionally written. Installation Recommended (clone directly into Claude Code skills directory) Manual install/update (only the skill file) If you already have this repo cloned (or you downloaded ), copy the skill file into Claude Code's skills directory: Usage In Claude Code, invoke the skill: Or ask Claude to humanize text directly: Overview Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, adapted for medical and scientific literature. Examples are derived from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial publications and from the author's (K. Matsui) observations during academic manuscript editing. Key Insight from Wikipedia "LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely result that applies to the widest variety of cases." 31 Patterns Detected (with Before/After Examples) Content Patterns |

Quick Facts

Stars181
Forks29
CategoryClaude Skill
Quality Score63.2465414487322/100
Last Updated2026-09-19
Created2026-02-04
Platformsclaude-code
Est. Tokens~19k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with humanizer_academic for enhanced workflows:

  • phd-skills — semantic(0.15)+complementary+similar_pop+shared_platform (45%)

humanizer_academic alternative? Top 4 similar tools

Looking for a humanizer_academic alternative? If you're comparing humanizer_academic with other claude skill tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • digital-marketing-pro by indranilbanerjee · ⭐ 795

    An open-source AI marketing operating system for strategy, SEO, AEO/GEO, paid media, content, CRM, and analyti

  • life-sciences by anthropics · ⭐ 566

    Repo for the Claude Code Marketplace to use with the Claude for Life Sciences Launch. This will continue to ho

  • claude-ai-mcp by anthropics · ⭐ 432

    Report issues related to MCP integration with Claude here.

  • skyll by assafelovic · ⭐ 240

    A tool for autonomous agents like OpenClaw to discover and learn skills autonomously

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is humanizer_academic?

humanizer_academic is A Claude Code skill that removes signs of AI-generated writing from academic medical papers, making them sound more natural and professionally written.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 181 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use humanizer_academic?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the humanizer_academic GitHub repository at github.com/matsuikentaro1/humanizer_academic. The project has 181 stars and 29 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to humanizer_academic?

The top alternatives to humanizer_academic on Agent Skills Hub include digital-marketing-pro, life-sciences, claude-ai-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools