groundingLMM — security grade SAFE, quality 61/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 61/100

Flagged: opens a tunnel service. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mbzuai-oryx · Agent Tool · ★ 967

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is groundingLMM safe to install? View the security audit →

About groundingLMM

GLaMM : Pixel Grounding Large Multimodal Model [CVPR 2024] Hanoona Rasheed\, Muhammad Maaz\, Sahal Shaji, Abdelrahman Shaker, Salman Khan, Hisham Cholakkal, Rao M. Anwer, Eric Xing, Ming-Hsuan Yang and Fahad Khan Mohamed bin Zayed University of AI, Australian National University, Aalto University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of California - Merced, Linköping University, Google Research [](https://www.youtube.com/wa

foundation-modelsllm-agentlmmvision-and-languagevision-language-model

Quick Facts

Stars967
Forks56
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score60.9276008749305/100
Open Issues36
Last Updated2026-09-05
Created2023-11-02
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with groundingLMM for enhanced workflows:

  • vllm-mlx — semantic(0.32)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (61%)
  • MLLM-Tool — semantic(0.18)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)
  • app-controller — semantic(0.23)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (53%)
  • mcp-ical — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)
  • OpenAdapt — semantic(0.15)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (50%)

groundingLMM alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a groundingLMM alternative? If you're comparing groundingLMM with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ai-agents-from-scratch by pguso · ⭐ 4.8k

    Demystify AI agents by building them yourself. Local LLMs, no black boxes, real understanding of function call

  • gptme by gptme · ⭐ 4.4k

    Your agent in your terminal, equipped with local tools: writes code, uses the terminal, browses the web. Make

  • langroid by langroid · ⭐ 4.1k

    Harness LLMs with Multi-Agent Programming

  • codeinterpreter-api by shroominic · ⭐ 3.8k

    👾 Open source implementation of the ChatGPT Code Interpreter

  • AgentBench by THUDM · ⭐ 3.7k

    A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs as Agents (ICLR'24)

  • awesome-generative-ai by filipecalegario · ⭐ 3.5k

    A curated list of Generative AI tools, works, models, and references

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is groundingLMM?

groundingLMM is [CVPR 2024 🔥] Grounding Large Multimodal Model (GLaMM), the first-of-its-kind model capable of generating natural language responses that are seamlessly integrated with object segmentation masks.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 967 GitHub stars.

What programming language is groundingLMM written in?

groundingLMM is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as foundation-models, llm-agent, lmm.

How do I install or use groundingLMM?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the groundingLMM GitHub repository at github.com/mbzuai-oryx/groundingLMM. The project has 967 stars and 56 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does groundingLMM use?

groundingLMM is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to groundingLMM?

The top alternatives to groundingLMM on Agent Skills Hub include ai-agents-from-scratch, gptme, langroid. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools