by mbzuai-oryx · Agent Tool · ★ 967
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: opens a tunnel service. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 967 |
| Forks | 56 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 36 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-05 |
| Created | 2023-11-02 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
GLaMM : Pixel Grounding Large Multimodal Model [CVPR 2024] Hanoona Rasheed\, Muhammad Maaz\, Sahal Shaji, Abdelrahman Shaker, Salman Khan, Hisham Cholakkal, Rao M. Anwer, Eric Xing, Ming-Hsuan Yang and Fahad Khan Mohamed bin Zayed University of AI, Australian National University, Aalto University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of California - Merced, Linköping University, Google Research...
These tools work well together with groundingLMM for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a groundingLMM alternative? If you're comparing groundingLMM with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Demystify AI agents by building them yourself. Local LLMs, no black boxes, real understanding of function call
Your agent in your terminal, equipped with local tools: writes code, uses the terminal, browses the web. Make
Harness LLMs with Multi-Agent Programming
👾 Open source implementation of the ChatGPT Code Interpreter
SRE Agent - CNCF Sandbox Project
A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs as Agents (ICLR'24)
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: