AutoMontage-Agent — security grade SAFE, quality 54/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 54/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mcdenil-skills · Codex Skill · ★ 6

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is AutoMontage-Agent safe to install? View the security audit →

About AutoMontage-Agent

Движок автомонтажа видео для ИИ-агента (Claude Code/Codex): субтитры, плашки, картинки под смысл, музыка, вертикаль. Локально, Remotion.

Quick Facts

Stars6
Forks6
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score54.3143882402646/100
Open Issues40
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-08-01
Platformsclaude-code, codex, node
Est. Tokens~25k

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is AutoMontage-Agent?

AutoMontage-Agent is Движок автомонтажа видео для ИИ-агента (Claude Code/Codex): субтитры, плашки, картинки под смысл, музыка, вертикаль. Локально, Remotion.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 6 GitHub stars.

What programming language is AutoMontage-Agent written in?

AutoMontage-Agent is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use AutoMontage-Agent?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the AutoMontage-Agent GitHub repository at github.com/mcdenil-skills/AutoMontage-Agent. The project has 6 stars and 6 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does AutoMontage-Agent use?

AutoMontage-Agent is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools