by remotion-dev · Claude Skill · ★ 76
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 76 |
| Forks | 29 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| Quality Score | 46/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-07-16 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
@remotion/claude-code-plugin Usage This is an internal package and has no documentation.
Looking for a claude-code-plugin alternative? If you're comparing claude-code-plugin with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI-powered video editor by @soyenriquerocha — built with Remotion + Claude Code. Describe videos in natural la
Long-term memory layer for OpenClaw & MoltBook agents that learns and recalls your project context automatical
Local-first coordination for human and agent work: durable work, decisions, dispatches, evidence, and prompt-f
Finish What You Start — Context engineering for Claude Code. Sessions last 20+ exchanges instead of cr
iOS development ClaudeCode plugin for mindful token and context usage. Contains modular MCPs that group variou
Epistemic protocols for Claude Code — structure human-AI interaction quality at every decision point - https:/
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: