hodor — security grade SAFE, quality 74/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 74/100

Flagged: reads sensitive env vars. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mr-karan · Agent Tool · ★ 111

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is hodor safe to install? View the security audit →

About hodor

Hodor Agentic code reviewer for GitHub PRs, GitLab MRs, Gitea/Forgejo PRs, and local diffs. Powered by the pi-coding-agent SDK. Hodor runs as a stateful agent with tools (, , , ) to autonomously analyze code changes, find bugs, and post structured reviews. Install Docker images are also available at for CI environments. Setup Usage bash Review a GitHub PR npx @mrkaran/hodor https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123 Review a GitLab MR (including self-hosted) npx @mrkaran/hodor https://gitlab.example.com/org/project/-/mergerequests/42 Review a Gitea or Forgejo PR npx @mrkaran/hodor https://gi

agentaici-cdcode-qualitycode-reviewdeveloper-toolslitellmopenhands

Quick Facts

Stars111
Forks15
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score74.2304698617891/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-09-30
Created2025-11-05
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~16k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with hodor for enhanced workflows:

  • CodeWhisper — semantic(0.23)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • agentuse — semantic(0.19)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • claude-plugins — semantic(0.27)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (54%)

hodor alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a hodor alternative? If you're comparing hodor with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Gito by Nayjest · ⭐ 436

    An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 517

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • agnix by agent-sh · ⭐ 430

    The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug

  • ai-reviewer by presubmit · ⭐ 187

    Context-aware AI reviewer for Pull Requests. Instant summary, line-by-line comments, title generation and more

  • agentpool by phil65 · ⭐ 181

    A unified agent orchestration hub that lets you configure and manage multiple AI agents (native, ACP, AGUI, Cl

  • CodeWhisper by gmickel · ⭐ 103

    CodeWhisper: AI-Powered End-to-End Task Implementation & blazingly fast Codebase-to-LLM Context Bridge

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is hodor?

hodor is Agentic code reviewer for GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs. Multi-step reasoning with autonomous tool orchestration — catches bugs requiring analysis across files.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 111 GitHub stars.

What programming language is hodor written in?

hodor is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as agent, ai, ci-cd.

How do I install or use hodor?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the hodor GitHub repository at github.com/mr-karan/hodor. The project has 111 stars and 15 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does hodor use?

hodor is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to hodor?

The top alternatives to hodor on Agent Skills Hub include Gito, roam-code, agnix. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools