No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by mturac · Codex Skill · ★ 87
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is everything-openai-codex safe to install? View the security audit →
Language: English ไทย Everything OpenAI Codex .
103 ready-to-use AI agent skills for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf,
Agent skills for Spec Kit
An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move
Cognitive architecture for AI-augmented software development. Specialized agents, structured workflows, and mu
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
everything-openai-codex is EOC: open-source operating system for OpenAI Codex workflows with agents, skills, hooks, rules, memory, safety gates, and cross-harness adapters.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 87 GitHub stars.
everything-openai-codex is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as agent-harness, agent-skills, ai-agents.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the everything-openai-codex GitHub repository at github.com/mturac/everything-openai-codex. The project has 87 stars and 4 forks, indicating an active community.
everything-openai-codex is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to everything-openai-codex on Agent Skills Hub include agent-skills, untether, awesome-ai-agent-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: