by nagameTW · Claude Skill · ★ 16
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Markdown |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-07-24 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
以台灣用語和中文標點重寫 blader/humanizer，含中國用語偵測。支援 Claude Code、Codex、Claude.ai
These tools work well together with formosa-humanizer for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a formosa-humanizer alternative? If you're comparing formosa-humanizer with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
From one sentence to a publishable book. 21 AI skills for Claude Code that automate the entire book writing pi
Best Practices for Claude Code Configuration
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: