by nfacha · Agent Tool · ★ 94
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 94 |
| Forks | 20 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Last Updated | 2024-05-18 |
| Created | 2023-04-11 |
| Platforms | browser, docker, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
AI Code Reviewer AI Code Reviewer is a Python script that leverages OpenAI's GPT-3.5-turbo to automatically review code changes in GitLab repositories. It listens for merge request and push events, fetches the associated code changes, and provides feedback on the changes in a Markdown format.
Looking for a OpenAI-Gitlab-PR-Review alternative? If you're comparing OpenAI-Gitlab-PR-Review with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The self-hosted AI workflow automation platform for Git repositories.
c4 GenAI Suite
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs,
Manage MCP servers, skills and plugins across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and more. Built-in marketplace, one-c
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: