No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by nicepkg · Agent Tool · ★ 495
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is ctxport safe to install? View the security audit →
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 | English Supported Platforms [, 30
Desktop AI Assistant powered by GPT-6, GPT-5, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, Grok, DeepSeek, Perplexity, chat, agents
Local AI app and inference engine for agents. Run open-weight LLMs locally — private, 100% offline on your com
Production-ready AI chat. Start here and make it your own. Formerly Sparka AI
Finish What You Start — Context engineering for Claude Code. Sessions last 20+ exchanges instead of cr
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
ctxport is Copy AI conversations as clean Markdown Context Bundles — one click from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok & GitHub. Copy from sidebar without opening. Zero upload, 100% local, open source.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 495 GitHub stars.
ctxport is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai, ai-chat, ai-tools.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ctxport GitHub repository at github.com/nicepkg/ctxport. The project has 495 stars and 120 forks, indicating an active community.
ctxport is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to ctxport on Agent Skills Hub include .claude, py-gpt, Atomic-Chat. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: