by oomkapwn · MCP Server · ★ 34
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 34 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 9 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-05-02 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
The #1 Obsidian MCP for AI memory — freshness-aware, cited, local-first and read-only by default. Dataview, Bases, PDFs, every agent.
Looking for a enquire-mcp alternative? If you're comparing enquire-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Persistent long-term memory for Claude Code via MCP — captures coding decisions, bugfixes, and context across
Codebase Context gives AI agents understanding of your codebase through semantic code search, team conventions
The recorder for your AI conversations — local-first MCP memory that keeps byte-exact copies of your Claude Co
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: