deck-dna: what it is & alternatives

by opitaru-sys · Claude Skill · ★ 44

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is deck-dna safe to install? View the security audit →

About deck-dna

A Claude skill that builds PPTX decks matching your real designer decks: extracted design DNA, measured word budget, render-QA loop.

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

Quick Facts

Stars44
Forks3
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.022598380723/100
Last Updated2026-07-11
Created2026-07-10
Platformsclaude-code
Est. Tokens~16k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with deck-dna for enhanced workflows:

  • eda-agent — semantic(0.24)+complementary+similar_pop+shared_platform (48%)
  • claude-code-design — semantic(0.22)+complementary+similar_pop+shared_platform (48%)

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is deck-dna?

deck-dna is A Claude skill that builds PPTX decks matching your real designer decks: extracted design DNA, measured word budget, render-QA loop.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 44 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use deck-dna?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the deck-dna GitHub repository at github.com/opitaru-sys/deck-dna. The project has 44 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does deck-dna use?

deck-dna is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools