Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 844 |
| Forks | 22 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 17 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-15 |
| Created | 2026-02-09 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~26k |
Anti Slop A GitHub Action that detects and automatically closes low-quality and AI slop PRs. It ships with 34 check rules covering PR branches, size, title, description, template, commit messages, file changes, user signals and contributor history.
Looking for a anti-slop alternative? If you're comparing anti-slop with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The self-hosted AI workflow automation platform for Git repositories.
One SQL interface for 60+ tools (e.g., GitHub, Notion, Airtable). Plug into any LLM through MCP.
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM
MCP server for semantic code research and context generation on real-time using LLM patterns | Search naturall
🚀 AI-powered code review tool for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Bitbucket Server, Azure DevOps and Gitea —
33 ways to spot AI-written text, right in your terminal. Before/after examples, draft checker, zero dependenci
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: